1) I consider only the Christian Old Testament and the New Testament, both in the English language, as I have virtually no knowledge of the Scriptures in any other translations.
- 2) The Old Testament is available today in many editions/translations. To claim that all, or indeed any, are the completely Inerrant Word of God is clearly not true, as there are many verbal differences between them. Many do not even claim to be accurate in every respect, e.g. the Good news Bible which is acknowledged to be a general compilation of ideas of Scripture rather than a precise translation. No one can deny that at the very best, all we have are translations of copies, of copies, of copies ............of copies of the originally divinely inspired Words of God. Since all of those copies of the Old Testament contain compelling warnings against altering even one letter of the original, the best that can be claimed is that a particular one best contains (preserves) the Inspired Word of God (along with some textual inaccuracies). Fortunately, by diligently comparing scripture with scripture we are able to safely determine the truely God inspired word.
Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Deu 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.
Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: (Some might claim that this verse applies only to the book of Revelation. Others that because it is placed at the end of the last book in the New Testament, it applies to the whole thereof. Personally, I prefer not to take any chance thereon and accept the latter.)
2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Over the years, several obvious textual errors have crept in. Some through deliberate action, others by genuine copying mistake. Most of them involve numerical items but some of them were clearly inserted to influence doctrine. A simple comparison of any suspect text with what is said elsewhere in the Scriptures will be enough to clarify the matter, often even with the numerical instances. However, there is no point in getting into detailed discussions (especially with non believers) over them where there is room for slightly different interpretations. Remember, each truly Bible believing Christian possesses and is possessed by the Holy Ghost who will lead him/her into all truth.
Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth:
1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
The basic texts from which most English bibles are based is known as the "Masoretic Text". By the 7th century AD, the mainstream Jews considered that their copies of the Old Testament (the Torah) had become unreliable, so over the next 300 years a sect called "Maserites" diligently researched their records and recompiled them. That work is referred to as the "Masoretic Text" or the "MS". Most of the English language bibles are based on this, some, like the NIV, with footnotes detailing differences. The MS was compiled by people who did not accept Jesus is the "Messiah" so they did amend some Messianic prophesies to reflect that. Also, the wording of the Old Testament approved by Jesus and the apostles (by their quotations therefrom) is not exactly "lost". During the last 300 years BC, a massive library was established at Alexandria and the librarian thereof instigated the translation of the Hebrew text into Greek. This became known as the Septuagint, carried out by 70 (it is claimed) Jewish Hebrew speaking teachers (scribes, Pharisees etc) who could speak Greek. and took 100 years or more. (clearly not all of the 70 were working at the same time). The text thereof, wherever comparable, concurs with that quoted by Jesus and the apostles and the Dead Sea scrolls, as well as the Samaritan Pentateuch (compiled without mainstream Jewish influence). Therefore, I take the view that the Septuagint represents the most reliable version of the Old testament as used by Jesus and the apostles.
In fact, the vast majority of the Septuagint agrees with the MS , many differences being in numbers and ages but where it does differ, I prefer the Septuagint. One clear difference is in 1 Kings 6.1 where a period of 480 years is used in the Masoritic versions and 440 in the Septuagint. Using the 440 years brings us to a period of Egyptian history in which the events correspond to the Bible, whereas the 480 years gives us problems in relating thereto.
The New Testament.
Apart from the Revelation, there is no support similar to that given for the Old Testament.
Rev 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
(Some might claim that this verse applies only to the book of Revelation. Others that because it is placed at the end of the last book in the New Testament, it applies to the whole thereof but it does use the words "prophesy of this book" )
What we do have is the clear authority for the teaching of the Disciples - the 12 Apostles, Paul replacing Judas Iscariot - plus at least 1 of Jesus' half-brothers who were present when Jesus said
Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
That covers every book of the New Testament except those written by Luke (his Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles). Jude and James were probably by Jesu's half-brothers but Paul apparently ranks that James alongside the Apostles.
Gal 1:19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
That is not to say luke's and James's's writings are unreliable, but anything they say which is not supported by other Scripture must be carefully considered. In particular, the Acts must not be used as a source of doctrine. It is an historical account and not covered by Inspiration. All it's doctrinal comments must be compared to the rest of Scripture. Paul was the Apostle appointed by The Lord to replace Judas (not Mathias who was selected by the disciples before they had received the Holy Ghost.)
Regarding Paul
1Ti 2:7 Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.
And several other verses.
Regarding Luke. Mathew's statement that Judas hanged himself seems to be contradicted by Luke. The Apostle's version must be preferred.
Mat 27:5 And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.
Act 1:18 Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
And in
Act 19:11 And God wrought special miracles by the hands of Paul:
Act 19:12 So that from his body were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of them.
Seems to be a dubious practice as not supported elsewhere in Scripture. I believe that one has to be very careful in determining doctrine solely from Acts.
Therefore, I believe that the God Inspired word is reliably available to us in written form. From the multitude of translations which have emerged since the First Century AD, I prefer the New International Version or the New King James Version as currently (2020) updated, provided they contain the margin notes detailing the known variations in the source material used. Where there is a variation from the Septuagint, I believe that the Septuagint is preferable. Minor differences which do not affect Doctrine are probably of no importance and should be regarded in the light of the Apostle Paul's guidance
1Ti 1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
1Ti 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
Tit 3:9 But a void foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.
The Pre-eminence of Scripture.
Any tradition of any so called "Church" which adds to or detracts from the Scriptures, must be regarded with great caution, as they will divert attention from the guidance of scripture and Satan will always seize any opportunity to corrupt the truth. As examples I list a few of such traditions/practices:
1. The appointment of a man as "Christ's representative on Earth". That office is solely the province of the Holy Spirit
Joh_14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
Joh_14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Joh_15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
Joh_16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
2. The elevation of the exhibition of Spiritual Gifts beyond that clearly stated in scripture. This is clearly an emotive subject and it is not for any true Christian to deny an experience claimed by another true Christian. All true Christians possess and are possessed by the Holy Spirit. However, exhibition of things like the Gifts of the Spirit, good works and Scriptural text knowledge can be fabricated and do not constitute evidence of the presence of the Holy Spirit. That is evidenced solely by the emergence of the Fruit of the Spirit.
Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Mat 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
3. The practice of repeating physical actions mentioned in scripture, (where they were used to illustrate an important doctrine), just because "they feel good". e.g. Group participation in foot washing based on
Joh 13:6 Then cometh he to Simon Peter: and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet?
Joh 13:7 Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.
Joh 13:8 Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me.
Joh 13:9 Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head.
Joh 13:10 Jesus saith to him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are clean,
Here, it is made absolutely clear that the incident foreshadowed the necessity of daily, or more frequently, spiritual cleansing by repentance and confession directly to The Lord.
To ascribe to this any lessor function is demeaning. The physical practice of foot washing was very necessary in those days and the disciples would have fully understood the Humility aspect. It is solely the spiritual aspect which they "shalt know hereafter".
4. The appointment of certain individuals long deceased as "Saints" with special powers, to whom prayers can be directed. All true believers are "Saints".
Rom 1:7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: And many other references.
5. The claim by some to be "Apostles".
1Co 15:8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.
1Co 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
Paul emphasizes that the "time" for appointing Apostles had passed, but as a special dispensation, he had been so appointed. The Old Testament prophesied that one Apostle would be lost and be replaced. The other apostles acknowledged this interpretation in
Act 1:20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his bishoprick let another take.
Psa 109:8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office.
It is also clear that to be an Apostle, one would have to have "seen Jesus" physically in order to be a witness of His Resurrection.
Act 1:21 Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,
Act 1:22 Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
1Co 15:8 And last of all he was seen of me also,